Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Friday held a series of meetings with prominent leaders of major political parties in Nepal including with President Ram Baran Yadav and underlined the need for an inclusive and federal Constitution for the country.
“In my meetings with Nepali leaders I stressed upon the need for an inclusive and federal Constitution in the Himalayan country,” Singh said in a tweet, describing his meetings with Nepalese leaders.
Singh is in Kathmandu to attend the sixth SAARC Interior/ Home Ministers’ meeting that concluded on Friday.
Those whom the Home Minister met include Chairman of Unified Communist Party of Nepal, Prachanda, Chairman of Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist) K P Oli and Madhesi leaders.
Singh told the Nepalese leaders that to achieve political stability in Nepal, the leaders of the country should work together to build a consensus on framing the Constitution.
“I am confident that Nepal will soon return on its path to political stability, peace and prosperity,” he said.
The Home Minister appreciated the political leaders of Nepal who broadly agreed to work on drafting a Constitution by taking all stakeholders into confidence.
Meanwhile, the SAARC Home Ministers’ conference unanimously adopted Singh’s proposal to establish a ‘Centre for Good Governance’.
Officers from SAARC member countries would share their experience on governance at the Centre.
Respected all Nepalese and Indian readers!
The India’s home affair minister of India respected Rajnath Singh met all the Party leaders of Congress, Maoist and UML and the PM of Nepal including Nepal’s home minister who are all the agents of Congress (I) and its RAW and CIA and EU. To meet the nonsense anti-Hindu leaders can never find the solution. Actually, they are traitors. I know- BJP leaders know all about these culprits of Nepal and India. The Nepalese traitors who are in regime since 2006, they must be trailed keeping in jail for the sake of stability, security and prestige of Nepal and world Hindus. The leaders of Congress, UML and Maoist imposed secularism, republic and ethnic-based federalism depressing the only world Hindu Kingdom and constitutional monarchy to break Nepal. Due to these traitors’ regime since 2006, Nepal is in risky position. They always dislike the BJP leadership in India. Now, Sonia’s regime is ended and then with compulsion, shamefully they are welcoming the BJP PM Narendra Modi, Sushma Sworaj and Rajnath Singh.
The reality is that Nepali Congress (NC), UML and UCPN (Maoist) leaderships have betrayed Nepal. No one can succeed by breaking the agreement. On 24, April, 2006, the uprising came to a stop after an agreement was reached between the monarchy, NC and UML and Maoist included. The agitators were pleading for monarchy as an alternative force in times of crisis. An agreement was reached to reinstate the House of Representatives, which was dissolved under NC recommendation four years ago, although the monarchy did not posses the right to reinstate it. The monarchy reinstated the parliament and appointed Girija Prasad Koirala to the post of premiership. The king himself in the royal palace premises gave the oath of office ceremony of Prime Minister. Gradually, the agreement reached with the king was broken and the royal institution attacked, which is a work of huge betrayal. A political agreement- 24 April, 2006 was a political betrayal.
In the context of Nepal, Nepalese monarchy is identified most convincing identity of Nepal’s independence, cultural unity and safeguards the Indian culture and peace also. I think, majority Indian people also want Hindu Kingdom with monarchy in Nepal and then the continuity of royal institution and Hindu Kingdom is the only way to stop the CIA and EU who have been active to Christianize Nepal and to break China, making the based land to Nepal, in the name of free-Tibet. After restoring the Hindu Kingdom and constitutional monarchy, Nepal and India can move the parliamentary democratic system by saving Nepal’s existence and freeing it of communist’s pressure and China’s intervention. And then, BJP Govt. should think the different development programmed including hydro power, border problem and others.
Senior leader of B.J.P Lalkrishna Advani had said: ‘The framework for constitutional monarchy in Nepal should be consolidated because monarchy is the symbol of Nepal’s identity and sovereignty. Nepal should have an active and dynamic multiparty democracy’. Present Home minister of the Govt. of India and the BJP leader Rajnath Singh the present home minister of India had said before four years- ‘We used to feel proud that Nepal was the only Hindu kingdom in the world. I will be happy when Nepal is a Hindu state again. We used to feel proud that Nepal was the only Hindu kingdom in the world. I will be happy when Nepal is a Hindu state again. No one is appealing to the Islamic states of Pakistan and Bangladesh to become secular. But it was done in Nepal.’ In this sense, the Indian home minister has forgotten all the past speech. Yes! To maintain the good relation with Nepal, I request to the BJP Govt. not to involve the former nonsense diplomat Rakesh sood in the visiting programmed in Nepal who was the follower of Congress (I) Sonia’s black regime. I am sorry to write that it was a great blunder of Indian diplomats- Shyam Saran- former Indian ambassador and former foreign Secretary of India (who was widely credited with bringing the present instability in Nepal), and the former foreign minister, Siva Shankar Mukharejee, the former Indian ambassadors in Nepal- Shyam Saran, KB Rajan, Rakesh Sood and Jayanta Prasad and present ambassador Ranjit Rea were the designers to terrorize Nepal. Due to the blunder of these Indian diplomats, the cordial relation between Nepal and India became unsatisfactory.
So, to maintain the harmonious relation with Nepal, the evil elements should be boycotted by BJP Govt.
The fact is that during the insurgency in Nepal the Nepalese Maoists, enjoyed the Indian soil as safe shelter and also received enough funds and underground trainings for its fighters for arms and explosives in the Indian camps. Through the 12-point agreement, Indian Govt Congress (I) became a decisive factor to remove the institution of monarchy with the help of the Nepali Maoist, which was declared terrorists by India. India played a double game while dealing with terrorism. In such condition, BJP should be answered the Congress (I)’s Govt. Indian politicians and diplomats? Without analyzing assumptions, why had the Congress (I) supported the Nepalese Maoist’s hypocrisy? ‘Crows are never white from washing.’ What were pitfalls of the Constitution of 1990? Why was it suspended without reason? That was the conspirator nefarious role of Congress (I) and its RAW. What kind of new constitution would we require? Why has India supported the Constituent assembly? These are the causes of crisis in Nepal. The anti-Indian voice is increasing day-by-day. Nepalese democratic exercise faced a black period in between 2005-2014. The nation’s future seems dark because they have walked as directed by unseen forces that beckon them without studying Nepal’s geographical reality and sensitivity. So, to end the crisis of Nepal, and to maintain the balance and cordial relation with India and China, there should be restored the unchangeable issues of 1990 (2047 B.S.) constitution in Nepal.
Thank you
Dirgha Raj Prasai
Kathmandu
Nepal