India reserves the right to retaliate at the “time and place of its choice” : Army Chief Gen Bikram Singh

In a clear warning to Pakistan in the aftermath of the beheading of an Indian soldier at LoC, Army Chief Gen Bikram Singh on Monday said India reserves the right to retaliate at the “time and place of its choice”.

Terming the beheading as “unacceptable” and “unpardonable”, he said India’s military has been asked to respond aggressively and offensively.

Talking tough, he said the killing of two Indian soldiers on the LoC in Mendhar area of Jammu and Kashmir on 6th January was a pre-planned and pre-meditated action by Pakistani troops.

Addressing a press conference in New Delhi on the eve of Army Day, Gen Singh said India’s response to Pakistani firing at its posts in LoC in J and K is measured and perfect.

“Beheading (of Lance Naik Hemraj) is unacceptable and unpardonable,” the Army Chief said about the incident in which Pakistan soldiers crossed into the Indian territory to attack Indian army patrol party.

“It (the attack) was stage-managed and pre-planned (by Pakistan). They (Pakistan) have planted lies to justify what they have done,” he said.He said the attack was carried out by Pakistan army personnel but did not rule out the possibility of Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists being associated with it.

Gen Singh said while the issue is being taken up with Pakistan at government and military levels, directions have been given to Army commanders to respond immediately if provoked.”India reserves its right to retaliate at the time and place of its choice. We won’t remain passive when attacked,” he said, adding he expected “commanders to be aggressive and offensive.”

He said the ceasefire, in place since November 2003, has been holding except for “some aberrations” for which he squarely blamed Pakistan.

News Team

We are a citizen journalism news Web site based in INDIA,that aims to put a human face on the news by showcasing vivid, first-person stories from individuals involved in current events. "We are driven by the belief that writing in the first person is more compelling than traditional journalism because it almost always requires the inclusion of personality. Third-person “he-said-she-said” reporting can mask the truth while making the reporter’s prejudice appear objective. "We invite ordinary people to tell their stories and photographs for free, letting readers vote on their favourites. The highest-rated stories star on the web site’s main pages, netting citizen journalists’ names high ratings and exposure on web search engines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *