Upset over the hurdles caused by the ban on the release of mega budget ‘Vishwaroopam’, an emotional Kamal Haasan has said Tamil Nadu does not want him to stay in the state and he might seek a “secular” place in the country or overseas.
“When M F Hussain can do it, Kamal Haasan will do it… I am fed up. I am an artiste. After that, I will have to seek a secular state for my stay… Secular state from Kashmir to Kerala, excluding Tamil Nadu… Tamil Nadu wants me out,” he said in a choked voice as the fate of the movie is still to be decided in the court.
The actor said he had pledged all his property to make the trilingual movie, estimated to have cost around Rs 100 crore. He said he might lose his house because of the losses incurred by the delay in the release of the movie.
Haasan said he was still to get interim relief as the film shows were “started and stopped” by police on Wednesday, who sought a physical copy of the single judge’s order passed last night, giving clearance of the film.”
“…But I believe that along with my Muslim friends, I have been instrument in a political game. I don’t know who is playing and not even hazarding the guess. The fact remains that my history has proven that I have been neither leaning to the left or right but trying to maintain my position,” Haasan said.
He said he would wait for the judgement of the Madras High Court where the Tamil Nadu government on Wednesday moved swiftly to file an appeal against the interim relief given by the single judge.
“Now I shall wait for the afternoon judgement but after this… I think I will have to see a secular state for me to stay in. I have nothing to lose. I might as well choose a place which would house an artiste like me.”
“I will learn in another couple of days whether I will be able to find a secular state in India or not. I will find, hopefully, another country which is secular that might take me in,” Haasan said.
We are a citizen journalism news Web site based in INDIA,that aims to put a human face on the news by showcasing vivid, first-person stories from individuals involved in current events.
"We are driven by the belief that writing in the first person is more compelling than traditional journalism because it almost always requires the inclusion of personality. Third-person â€œhe-said-she-saidâ€ reporting can mask the truth while making the reporterâ€™s prejudice appear objective.
"We invite ordinary people to tell their stories and photographs for free, letting readers vote on their favorites. The highest-rated stories star on the web site main pages, netting citizen journalists names high ratings and exposure on web search engines.