Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has dampened the sentiments for nuclear energy in India

Former Chairman of Atomic Energy Commission Dr Anil Kakodkar on Monday said though Japan’s March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has dampened the sentiments for nuclear energy in India, the country needs more of these projects.

“Post-Fukushima accident in Japan, the sentiment for nuclear energy has dampened here. But it will grow now,” Kakodkar said.

The country needs more nuclear projects, he said, adding, “Many new nuclear reactors must come up in view of India’s energy challenges.”

Kakodkar was honoured with ‘Dr Vikram Sarabhai Senior Scientist Award – 2012’ constituted by Shri Hari Om Ashram on Monday. The award was presented to him by Dr U R Rao, Chairman of Council of Management of Physical Research Laboratory.

India is doing well in the solar energy sector, but required new technologies, the eminent nuclear scientist said.

Stating that India’s energy imports would rise by 60 per cent by 2031-32 and energy import bill by 18 per cent at Compounded Annual Growth Rate during the same period, Kakodkar emphasised the need for greater thrust towards renewable as well as nuclear energy to minimise imports as well as carbon emissions.

Expressing reservations over the Nuclear Liability Act, the Padma Vibhushan awardee scientist said it would push India’s nuclear energy ambitions backwards as it fixes the responsibility of nuclear reactors on the manufacturers.

Section 17(B) of the Act specifically fixes responsibility of the manufacturers of nuclear reactors and provides for their liability in the event of an accident involving design or a manufacturing fault.

“There should be regulation…a strict regulatory regime should be in place. But, if you want to fix the responsibility on manufacturers, nobody would supply nuclear reactors to India,” he said.

About News Team

We are a citizen journalism news Web site based in INDIA,that aims to put a human face on the news by showcasing vivid, first-person stories from individuals involved in current events. "We are driven by the belief that writing in the first person is more compelling than traditional journalism because it almost always requires the inclusion of personality. Third-person “he-said-she-said” reporting can mask the truth while making the reporter’s prejudice appear objective. "We invite ordinary people to tell their stories and photographs for free, letting readers vote on their favorites. The highest-rated stories star on the web site main pages, netting citizen journalists names high ratings and exposure on web search engines.

View all posts by News Team →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.